Re: Detection of hadware feature => please do not use signal

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Bastien Roucariès <rouca(at)debian(dot)org>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Detection of hadware feature => please do not use signal
Date: 2024-11-25 22:40:10
Message-ID: 1492578.1732574410@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

I wrote:
> And done. In the event I decided to try the +simd option first,
> reasoning that that's correct on the majority of current ARM systems.
> I'm interested to see what the older buildfarm ARM animals pick.

Early returns are that they're all picking the +simd option, and
seem to be just as happy with that as they were without it.
I wonder if we could just drop the "without" probe altogether.
It'd save some configure cycles for other platforms (since they'll
fruitlessly run through all of these tests).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2024-11-26 02:03:49 Re: Build failure with GCC 15 (defaults to -std=gnu23)
Previous Message Dean Rasheed 2024-11-25 20:42:37 Re: BUG #18722: Processing arrays with plpgsql raises errors