Re: Detection of hadware feature => please do not use signal

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Bastien Roucariès <rouca(at)debian(dot)org>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Detection of hadware feature => please do not use signal
Date: 2024-11-25 17:53:58
Message-ID: 1430419.1732557238@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

I wrote:
> Also, there's no +fp option for "-march=armv8-a" because the
> ARMv8 specs require chips to implement both or neither of FP
> and SIMD. So the idiomatic thing for us to write is not a
> separate -mfpu spec but "-march=armv8-a+crc+simd". I'll
> adjust my patch to do it like that and push later today.

And done. In the event I decided to try the +simd option first,
reasoning that that's correct on the majority of current ARM systems.
I'm interested to see what the older buildfarm ARM animals pick.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2024-11-25 17:59:05 Re: BUG #18722: Processing arrays with plpgsql raises errors
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-11-25 15:57:22 Re: Build failure with GCC 15 (defaults to -std=gnu23)