From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Maciek Sakrejda <m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Getting Started section |
Date: | 2016-03-02 14:51:11 |
Message-ID: | 14897.1456930271@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Agreed, but I should think that properly packaged versions of Postgres
>> will come with some package-specific instructions. Is that missing
>> in Debian's version, or out of date, or did he just not read it?
> It's definitely there for debian - it's in
> /usr/share/doc/postgresql-common/README.Debian.gz
> The bigger question is, is it worth actually more or less importing the
> contents of that into our main documentation.
I'm definitely -1 on that; there are too many distinct packagings and they
change asynchronously to our releases. As a concrete example, the docs
for Red Hat's version needed to change when they moved from SysV init
scripts to systemd boot. Would we want to keep *both* versions of that
in our manual, and explain exactly which RHEL/CentOS/Fedora versions the
different texts applied to? No thanks ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2016-03-02 16:07:42 | Re: Getting Started section |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2016-03-02 14:39:52 | Re: Getting Started section |