| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Moving responsibility for logging "database system is shut down" |
| Date: | 2016-02-10 21:39:59 |
| Message-ID: | 14701.1455140399@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> So I propose the attached patch. Any objections? Should this get
>> back-patched? It's arguably a bug, though surely a minor one, that
>> the message comes out when it does.
> I would vote against a back-patch. And I kind of agree with Jim's
> comments that we ought to consider sprinkling a few more debug
> messages into the shutdown sequence.
[ shrug... ] I won't stand in the way of someone else figuring out
what makes sense there, but I don't intend to do it; and I don't think
that the quick hacks I did over the last couple days make a reasonable
basis for a permanent patch.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-02-10 22:15:04 | Remove or weaken hints about "effective resolution of sleep delays is 10 ms"? |
| Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2016-02-10 21:27:28 | Re: old bug in full text parser |