From: | rob stone <floriparob(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dane Foster <studdugie(at)gmail(dot)com>, bret_stern <bret_stern(at)machinemanagement(dot)com> |
Cc: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Berend Tober <btober(at)computer(dot)org>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: A motion |
Date: | 2016-01-25 00:52:20 |
Message-ID: | 1453683140.6223.2.camel@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, 2016-01-24 at 17:27 -0500, Dane Foster wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 4:00 PM, bret_stern <bret_stern(at)machinemanage
> ment.com> wrote:
> > Adrian,
> > I hope you reconsider. You have far more value to the list.
> > The CoC dictators will flame out, then where will we be.
> > Just sit on the sidelines until the show is
> > over.
> > Look forward to the next awesome year.
> > My CoC: "keep it technical"
> >
> > Fore
> >
>
> +1 To Adrian sticking around. I'm relatively new to participating on
> this list and PostgreSQL in general and you've been extremely helpful
> to me personally in answering questions I've raised and providing
> guidance/suggestions. I'm no fan of the CoC conversation either so I
> scan then delete and go on w/ my day. It's a strategy that is working
> for me and I hope you will adopt it and stick around. Newbies like
> myself need people like on this list.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dane
>
Plus one.
It's supposed to be a technical list.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-01-25 01:11:57 | Re: CoC [Final v2] |
Previous Message | John R Pierce | 2016-01-25 00:03:50 | Re: CoC [Final v2] |