Re: CRCs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CRCs
Date: 2001-01-14 04:20:30
Message-ID: 14414.979446030@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

ncm(at)zembu(dot)com (Nathan Myers) writes:
>> Instead of a partial row CRC, we could just as well use some other bit
>> of identifying information, say the row OID. ...

> Good. But, wouldn't the TID be more specific?

Uh, the TID *is* the pointer from index to heap. There's no redundancy
that way.

> Would this check be simple enough to be safe for 7.1?

It'd probably be safe, but adding OIDs to index tuples would force an
initdb, which I'd rather avoid at this stage of the cycle.

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: CRCs at 2001-01-13 23:33:59 from Nathan Myers

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2001-01-14 06:32:52 RPMS for 7.1beta3 in progress.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-01-14 04:11:57 Re: Transactions vs speed.