Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-04 03:47:31
Message-ID: 14222.1115178451@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> As for CVS - if we can't do development the way we want using it then it's
> time to replace it.

CVS's capabilities (or lack of same) are completely unrelated to the
matter in hand. What we are talking about is packaging, ie what should
sensibly go out in the same shipped tarball.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-05-04 03:54:19 Re: A proper fix for the conversion-function problem
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-05-04 03:43:41 Re: pg_locks needs a facelift