| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_locks needs a facelift |
| Date: | 2005-05-04 03:43:41 |
| Message-ID: | 14187.1115178221@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Jim C. Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> writes:
> On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:22:08AM -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> 1998 when the oid played a larger role, it is now quite rightly
>> deprecated and my intention is to remove it from the userlock module.
> I wish you wouldn't since http://rrs.decibel.org uses it.
Don't worry, I'll veto any immediate removal of functionality ;-)
The correct way to handle this is to add some better userlock
functionality and deprecate what's there. We can remove the crufty
stuff in a release or three after it's been officially deprecated
... but there is no reason to remove it immediately. It won't conflict
with a better version, just exist alongside.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-04 03:47:31 | Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-05-04 03:43:37 | Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement |