Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On 05.03.23 00:04, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I've gone through this and have a modest suggestion: let's invent some
>> wrapper functions around encode(sha256()) to reduce the cosmetic diffs
>> and consequent need for closer study of patch changes. In the attached
>> I called them "notmd5()", but I'm surely not wedded to that name.
> Do you mean create this on the fly in the test suite, or make it a new
> built-in function?
The former --- please read my version of the patch.
regards, tom lane