Re: Ordering of header file inclusion

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Ordering of header file inclusion
Date: 2019-10-21 03:22:21
Message-ID: 13988.1571628141@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 10:58 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Should we make this changes only in master branch or should we make in
>> back branches also.

> I am in favor of doing this only for HEAD, but I am fine if others
> want to see for back branches as well and you can prepare the patches
> for the same.

There is no good reason to back-patch this.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-10-21 04:22:21 Re: Missing error_context_stack = NULL in AutoVacWorkerMain()
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2019-10-21 03:17:04 Re: Ordering of header file inclusion