From: | David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_stat_activity |
Date: | 2014-04-02 19:49:44 |
Message-ID: | 1396468184822-5798390.post@n5.nabble.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Jeff Janes wrote
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Bala Venkat <
> akpgeek@
> > wrote:
>
>> We are using postgres 9.0. When I looked at the pg_stat_activity table.
>>
>> I have some rows where there is difference of 2 hours between
>> backend_start and xact_start
>>
>> But there is only few milli seconds between xact_start and query_start.
>>
>> All them have wait as false.
>>
>> My question is, is the query still executing and also why would there be
>> that much time difference between backend_start and xact_start
>>
>
> Say I connect to the database, and then I go to lunch for 2 hours. Then I
> come back and start a transaction.
>
> Or, I connect to the database and run a two-hour query. Then
> rollback/commit that, and I start another transaction.
>
> To know the state of the query, look at the "current_query" field. (In
> newer versions, look in "state" field, but that is not in 9.0)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeff
Or more commonly (I think at least) connection pools that keep connections
open. Not sure but I don't think a session reset clears the back-end time
so this would be the observed behavior.
David J.
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/pg-stat-activity-tp5798382p5798390.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brent Wood | 2014-04-02 19:50:54 | Re: SSD Drives |
Previous Message | Rob Sargent | 2014-04-02 19:37:24 | COPY v. java performance comparison |