Re: (collation) Building postgresql on FreeBSD, the pros and cons of icu

From: Patrick Dung <patrick_dkt(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)hk>
To: Patrick Dung <patrick_dkt(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)hk>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: (collation) Building postgresql on FreeBSD, the pros and cons of icu
Date: 2013-10-26 04:57:02
Message-ID: 1382763422.11547.YahooMailNeo@web193505.mail.sg3.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 10:00 PM, Patrick Dung <patrick_dkt(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)hk> wrote:

> On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 9:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Patrick Dung <patrick_dkt(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)hk> writes:
>
>  By default, FreeBSD ports does not build postgresql with icu (http://www.icu-project.org/
> ).
>
> Postgres does not have any option to use ICU, default or otherwise.
> Nor is it likely to happen in future, judging from previous discussions
> of the idea.
>
>             regards, tom lane
>

OK, now I understand that FreeBSD case, they have a specific patch to use icu.
The default PostgreSQL does use ICU.
Thanks for pointing that out.

Thanks,

Patrick

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Patrick Dung 2013-10-26 05:00:29 Re: (collation) Building postgresql on FreeBSD, the pros and cons of icu
Previous Message David Johnston 2013-10-25 21:47:16 Re: Detecting change in event properties