Re: libpgport vs libpgcommon

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpgport vs libpgcommon
Date: 2013-10-19 01:42:45
Message-ID: 1382146965.21792.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 16:00 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Please have a look at my patch at
> 20130827215416(dot)GF4933(at)eldon(dot)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org particularly the checkdir.c
> file. Perhaps we'd like to put both these routines (which are related
> to directories) in a single file (directory.c?). In that case I would
> suggest putting your new routine in that file, and we'd add the
> checkdir
> stuff in there eventually.

I think smaller files are better, especially for a static library.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-10-19 02:00:05 Re: [PATCH] Add an ldapoption to disable chasing LDAP referrals
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2013-10-19 00:22:51 Re: FDW API / flow charts for the docs?