From: | Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Rebecca Clarke <r(dot)clarke83(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Function tracking |
Date: | 2013-06-07 16:51:31 |
Message-ID: | 1370623891.63625.YahooMailNeo@web133205.mail.ir2.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> From: Rebecca Clarke <r(dot)clarke83(at)gmail(dot)com>
>To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
>Sent: Friday, 7 June 2013, 11:30
>Subject: [GENERAL] Function tracking
>
>
>
>Hi all
>
>
>I'm looking for suggestions on the best way to track the updates to a function.
>
>
>We have two databases, Dev & Live, so I want to update Live with just the functions that have been modified in the DEV databas3e.
>Is there another, easier way to track the updates than manually recording it in a document? (I'm trying to eliminate human interference).
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Glyn Astill | 2013-06-07 16:54:19 | Re: Function tracking |
Previous Message | François Beausoleil | 2013-06-07 16:00:52 | Re: Slave promotion failure |