Re: Function tracking

From: Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Rebecca Clarke <r(dot)clarke83(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Function tracking
Date: 2013-06-07 16:51:31
Message-ID: 1370623891.63625.YahooMailNeo@web133205.mail.ir2.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> From: Rebecca Clarke <r(dot)clarke83(at)gmail(dot)com>
>To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
>Sent: Friday, 7 June 2013, 11:30
>Subject: [GENERAL] Function tracking
>
>
>
>Hi all
>
>
>I'm looking for suggestions on the best way to track the updates to a function.
>
>
>We have two databases, Dev & Live, so I want to update Live with just the functions that have been modified in the DEV databas3e. 
>Is there another, easier way to track the updates than manually recording it in a document? (I'm trying to eliminate human interference).
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Glyn Astill 2013-06-07 16:54:19 Re: Function tracking
Previous Message François Beausoleil 2013-06-07 16:00:52 Re: Slave promotion failure