From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ian Pilcher <arequipeno(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Range for user-defined SQLSTATE codes |
Date: | 2013-01-26 15:40:48 |
Message-ID: | 1359214848.46791.YahooMailNeo@web162904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Ian Pilcher <arequipeno(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I can't be the first person (or even the 10,000th) to want to define my
> own SQLSTATE codes when raising errors in a stored procedure. I've
> just tested doing so in a PL/pgSQL function access via JDBC, and I had
> no problem retrieving the non-standard state from the SQLException. (I
> used 'WWWWW' and 'ZZZZZ' as my tests.)
>
> Is there anything like a standard range -- formal or otherwise -- for
> such codes? A best practice? A general consensus? A half-painted
> bike shed?
There is this in the SQL standard. According to that, SQLSTATE
values with 0-4 or A-H in both the first and third positions are
reserved for values defined by standards. All others are available
for "implementation-specified" exception conditions. As far as I
know, the PostgreSQL community has claimed SQLSTATE values with P0
or XX in the start of a SQLSTATE or P in the third character. To
allow for future expansion by the PostgreSQL community it might be
wise to stay away from any SQLSTATE starting with P for your
application use.
-Kevin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-01-26 16:52:18 | Re: Range for user-defined SQLSTATE codes |
Previous Message | Rafał Pietrak | 2013-01-26 14:08:53 | Re: self join for history analyzis |