Re: contrib translations

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: contrib translations
Date: 2012-09-14 13:59:45
Message-ID: 1347630960-sup-1754@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie sep 14 10:37:18 -0300 2012:
> Someone asked me about translations for pg_upgrade, and I don't see 'po'
> directories for any of the contrib tools. Do we not translate contrib
> stuff? Why?

We don't. I don't know the exact reason, but I know that while perusing
pg_upgrade's source recently I found several things that will need to be
changed there in order for it to be decently translatable. Some _()
were in the wrong places, there are several cases of sentences being
constructed from parts, and so on.

If we were to move it to src/bin/ then we would have to talk about
translatability. Prior to that I would think it's premature. I mean,
if we don't consider it good enough to be in src/bin/, why waste
translator time on it?

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit kapila 2012-09-14 14:04:51 Re: Minor inheritance/check bug: Inconsistent behavior
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-09-14 13:42:58 pgsql: Properly set relpersistence for fake relcache entries.