Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft
Date: 2020-09-15 18:11:01
Message-ID: 1339394.1600193461@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> On 9/15/20 1:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> After thinking a bit, I'm inclined to agree that we should move it
>> to "Incompatibilities". It is a core server change (third-party
>> extensions don't have a choice to opt out, as per postgis' issue),
>> and even if it's trivial, we have some even-more-trivial issues
>> listed there, like command tag changes.

> How about this?

The other incompatibilities are only listed once, if they're minor.
I was just about to commit the attached.

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
doc-fix.patch text/x-diff 1.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2020-09-15 18:25:27 Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft
Previous Message Jonathan S. Katz 2020-09-15 18:05:24 Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft