Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft
Date: 2020-09-15 18:05:24
Message-ID: 10ed2406-11f9-8297-6e4e-2849a8fa6ed4@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/15/20 1:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> On 9/15/20 12:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Ah. OK, we can certainly extend it to mention that. How about
>>> (not bothering with markup yet)
>>>
>>> Remove support for upgrading unpackaged (pre-9.1) extensions (Tom Lane)
>>> +
>>> +The FROM option of CREATE EXTENSION is no longer supported.
>
>> +1.
>
>> With that in place, I'm more ambivalent to whether or not it's mentioned
>> in the incompatibilities section as well, though would lean towards
>> having a mention of it there as it technically is one. But I don't feel
>> too strongly about it.
>
> After thinking a bit, I'm inclined to agree that we should move it
> to "Incompatibilities". It is a core server change (third-party
> extensions don't have a choice to opt out, as per postgis' issue),
> and even if it's trivial, we have some even-more-trivial issues
> listed there, like command tag changes.

How about this?

Jonathan

Attachment Content-Type Size
create-extension-from-v2.patch text/plain 1.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-09-15 18:11:01 Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft
Previous Message Andres Freund 2020-09-15 18:04:13 Re: Allow ERROR from heap_prepare_freeze_tuple to be downgraded to WARNING