From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Clément Prévost <prevostclement(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered |
Date: | 2016-06-19 15:36:42 |
Message-ID: | 13382.1466350602@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Would this not result in unstable test output depending on whether the
>> code executes in the leader or a worker?
> Before doing that test, we set force_parallel_mode=1, so it should always
> execute in worker which will ensure a stable output.
No, it *might* execute in a worker. If you can get one.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-06-19 18:01:49 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: BUG #14199: The pg_ctl status check on server start is not compatible with the silent_mode=on |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-06-19 11:02:51 | Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver |