| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kirk Parker <khp(at)equatoria(dot)us>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Typo in PL/pgSQL trigger Example 43.4? |
| Date: | 2023-10-09 13:45:46 |
| Message-ID: | 133678.1696859146@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
>> On 7 Oct 2023, at 22:22, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Yeah, either way has the same result. However, I wonder if we should
>> change this example to use current_user for clarity. It does look
>> more like it's intended to be a variable or column reference than
>> a built-in function.
> Agreed, and "user" is a hard search term to use for discovering what it is. +1
> for changing to current_user.
OK, I'll take care of this later today.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brad White | 2023-10-09 17:34:26 | Re: ODBC options |
| Previous Message | Tim Needham | 2023-10-09 10:38:43 | Re: Example numeric constants aren't valid? |