Re: machine-readable explain output

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: machine-readable explain output
Date: 2009-06-14 17:02:51
Message-ID: 13289.1244998971@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> However, using BuildTupleFromCStrings is wasteful/stupid for *both*
>> text and xml output, so it seems like getting rid of it is the thing
>> to do here.

> Makes sense. However, if we just make that change in do_tup_output(),
> then we'll break the ability to use that function for non-text
> datatypes.

I'd envision it taking Datums, so it doesn't really matter. However,
as you say, specializing it to text only wouldn't be much of a loss.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-06-14 17:04:22 Re: machine-readable explain output
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-06-14 17:00:24 Re: machine-readable explain output