From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Nikhil Sontakke <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikhil Sontakke <nikhil(dot)sontakke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Concurrent CREATE TABLE/DROP SCHEMA leaves inconsistent leftovers |
Date: | 2011-11-14 19:26:04 |
Message-ID: | 1321298707-sup-8007@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun nov 14 15:56:43 -0300 2011:
> Well, it looks to me like there are three different places that we
> need to nail down: RangeVarGetAndCheckCreationNamespace() is used for
> relations (except that a few places call RangeVarGetCreationNamespace
> directly, which means my previous patch probably needs some tweaking
> before commit), QualifiedNameGetCreationNamespace() is used for pretty
> much all other schema-qualified objects, and LookupCreationNamespace()
> is used for ALTER BLAH SET SCHEMA (which I think has a problem when
> you rename an object into a schema that is concurrently being
> dropped).
>
> I'm fairly unhappy with the idea of modifying a function that is
> described as doing a "get" or "lookup" to have the side effect of
> "locking something". So probably some renaming or refactoring is in
> order here. It seems like we're duplicating almost identical logic in
> an awful lot of places in namespace.c.
So RangeVarGetCheckAndLockCreationNamespace(), uh? Pity you can't
stick a comma in there.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-11-14 19:47:17 | Re: strict aliasing (was: const correctness) |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-11-14 18:56:43 | Re: Concurrent CREATE TABLE/DROP SCHEMA leaves inconsistent leftovers |