Re: improve ssl error code, 2147483650

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, David Zhang <david(dot)zhang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: improve ssl error code, 2147483650
Date: 2024-06-25 14:21:58
Message-ID: 1318844.1719325318@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> writes:
> On 21.06.24 16:53, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Most of libpq gets at strerror_r via SOCK_STRERROR for Windows
>> portability. Is that relevant here?

> Looking inside the OpenSSL code, it makes no efforts to translate
> between winsock error codes and standard error codes, so I don't think
> our workaround/replacement code needs to do that either.

Fair enough.

> Btw., our source code comments say something like
> "ERR_reason_error_string randomly refuses to map system errno values."
> The reason it doesn't is exactly that it can't do it while maintaining
> thread-safety.

Ah. Do you want to improve that comment while you're at it?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-06-25 14:23:53 Re: add a new explain option including_query for include query string inside the json plan output
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2024-06-25 14:20:30 Re: Direct SSL connection and ALPN loose ends