Re: SSI 2PC coverage

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SSI 2PC coverage
Date: 2011-08-25 20:49:51
Message-ID: 1314305384-sup-7191@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié ago 24 22:11:58 -0300 2011:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > After having to play with this, I didn't like it very much, because
> > regression.diffs gets spammed with the (rather massive and completely
> > useless) diff in that test. For the xml tests, rather than ignoring it
> > fail on an installation without libxml, we use an alternative output.
>
> > Unless there are objections, I will commit the alternative file proposed
> > by Dan.
>
> +1 ... "ignore" is a pretty ugly hack here.

Done.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message hubert depesz lubaczewski 2011-08-25 20:53:18 Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade problem
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-08-25 20:43:02 Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade problem