From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SSI 2PC coverage |
Date: | 2011-08-25 01:11:58 |
Message-ID: | 12940.1314234718@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> After having to play with this, I didn't like it very much, because
> regression.diffs gets spammed with the (rather massive and completely
> useless) diff in that test. For the xml tests, rather than ignoring it
> fail on an installation without libxml, we use an alternative output.
> Unless there are objections, I will commit the alternative file proposed
> by Dan.
+1 ... "ignore" is a pretty ugly hack here.
Eventually we need some way of detecting that specific tests should be
skipped because they're irrelevant to the current system configuration.
contrib/sepgsql is already doing something of the sort, but it's rather
crude ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Wang | 2011-08-25 01:18:58 | Re: [HACKERS] blog post on ancient history |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2011-08-25 00:43:34 | Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only |