| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Gianni Ciolli <gianni(dot)ciolli(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: maximum digits for NUMERIC |
| Date: | 2011-04-27 03:38:17 |
| Message-ID: | 1303875452-sup-384@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mar abr 26 12:58:19 -0300 2011:
> Wow, I am so glad someone documented this. I often do factorial(4000)
> which generates 12673 digits when teaching classes, and it bugged me
> that we documented the limit as 1000 digits.
I keep wondering why you want to know factorial(4000) so often.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2011-04-27 03:44:27 | Re: Alignment padding bytes in arrays vs the planner |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-04-27 03:36:32 | Re: offline consistency check and info on attributes |