From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: offline consistency check and info on attributes |
Date: | 2011-04-27 03:36:32 |
Message-ID: | 1303875211-sup-4411@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Tomas Vondra's message of mar abr 26 17:39:19 -0300 2011:
> Dne 25.4.2011 18:16, Alvaro Herrera napsal(a):
> > This reminds me -- we need to have pg_filedump be able to dump the
> > relmapper stuff. I was going to write a patch for it but then I forgot.
>
> Was this a polite question whether I volunteer to write that patch? ;-)
>
> I've never used pg_filedump and I'm not quite sure what exactly is
> needed, but it seem simple enough to do it. OK, I know the iceberg that
> sank Titanic seemed small too ...
Err, no, sorry if you thought it was. If you still want to volunteer
I'm sure it'd be more than welcome.
> I think I'll move the integrity check to the db, so that it's possible
> to check the column lengths etc. (pageinspect seems like a good module
> to mutilate in this direction) but I still believe it'd be useful to
> have an offline tool for basic checks. Would pg_filedump be a resonable
> tool to do that?
No, I don't think pg_filedump is a good host for such checks. If we're
going to have a tool to do that it'd be better to be able to include it in
core (or at least contrib), and we can't have pg_filedump in there for
licensing reasons.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-04-27 03:38:17 | Re: maximum digits for NUMERIC |
Previous Message | Dmitry Fefelov | 2011-04-27 03:29:03 | Fail to search in array, produced by subquery - is it a bug? |