| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>, Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, cbbrowne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, greg <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers |
| Date: | 2011-04-20 20:55:58 |
| Message-ID: | 1303332958.24785.26.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 16:25 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> But ignoring scheduling difficulties, my point here is that
> it seems like the shorter the cycle, the better, for a lot of
> purposes. Can we do any better than once-a-month, or is that the
> limit given that people need flexible schedules within the fest?
If you want to keep the basic idea of predictable periods of activity
and rest, I think that's as far as you can go.
I'm personally not terribly tied to that; I'm more interested in the
tool support that the CF gives us. I might also like, for example, just
a permanent patch queue with patches sorted by date. Multiple
approaches like that could also very well exist in parallel, even within
the existing commitfest application framework.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-04-20 21:05:51 | Re: pgindent weirdness |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2011-04-20 20:42:04 | Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers |