Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: johnsw(at)wardbrook(dot)com
Cc: "Cott Lang" <cott(at)internetstaff(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5?
Date: 2004-01-22 17:24:30
Message-ID: 12954.1074792270@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"John Sidney-Woollett" <johnsw(at)wardbrook(dot)com> writes:
> With Oracle you have the option of EITHER exporting the database
> (equivalent to doing pg_dump) OR taking the database offline and carrying
> out a file system level copy of the database files.

The planned PITR feature would not require you to take anything offline.
The whole concept of an "offline" database is an Oracle-ism that I see
no value in emulating.

> One caveat for Oracle (at least in 8.1.x) is that DDL statements are not
> recorded in the archive logs, and can screw things up. Best to take a new
> export/dump after making DDL changes!

Well, we're ahead of them on that...

> The difference between Oracle and Postgres appears to be that posgres
> requires a file system level copy of the database instead of being able to
> make use of a dump file for this type of recovery. Is that correct?

I dunno what a "dump file" would equate to in Postgres terms, but yeah,
we're envisioning using ordinary filesystem tools (tar, say) as the
mechanism for handling a baseline backup.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-01-22 17:26:47 Re: Lost plpgsql function
Previous Message Steve Atkins 2004-01-22 17:21:27 Re: embedded/"serverless" (Re: serverless postgresql)