| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jürgen Purtz <juergen(at)purtz(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Graphic to visualize data flow between processes, buffers and files |
| Date: | 2016-01-04 15:46:00 |
| Message-ID: | 12911.1451922360@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-novice |
=?UTF-8?Q?J=c3=bcrgen_Purtz?= <juergen(at)purtz(dot)de> writes:
> I wonder whether we should have a graphic showing an overview of the
> main backend processes and their interaction with memory and files -
> something like figure 15-1 of:
> https://docs.oracle.com/database/121/CNCPT/process.htm. Or is there a
> general policy to avoid graphics in our documentation - or an advice to
> use a special format for graphics?
There have been discussions about how to incorporate graphics, which
have failed to come to any consensus. Nobody is particularly willing
to put a badly-formatted batch of raw numbers into git though, because
it'd be impossible to do any incremental updates on it and still have
useful git history. There are also a bunch of questions about whether
the graphics would work in all the output formats we try to support.
This particular example doesn't really seem compelling enough to
justify finding a way over those hurdles ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jürgen Purtz | 2016-01-05 19:05:37 | Re: Graphic to visualize data flow between processes, buffers and files |
| Previous Message | Jürgen Purtz | 2016-01-04 15:35:36 | Graphic to visualize data flow between processes, buffers and files |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Killian Driscoll | 2016-01-04 22:25:01 | How can I combine these two dependent views into one view? |
| Previous Message | Jürgen Purtz | 2016-01-04 15:35:36 | Graphic to visualize data flow between processes, buffers and files |