From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Round Robin Reviewers <pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function |
Date: | 2010-08-06 04:38:12 |
Message-ID: | 1281069492.27584.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-rrreviewers |
On tis, 2010-07-27 at 16:33 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> * Do we already have it?
>
> Not really. There are kludges to accomplish these things, but
> they're available mostly in the sense that a general-purpose
> language allows you to write code to do anything a Turing machine
> can do.
I think this has been obsoleted by the xmlexists patch.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | pgsql-hackers | 2010-08-06 06:15:54 | pgsql-hackers@news.hub.org 21% OFF on Pfizer! |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-08-06 03:57:37 | Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mike Fowler | 2010-08-06 08:04:15 | Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-08-06 02:29:10 | Re: [PATCH] Re: Adding xpath_exists function |