Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off
Date: 2011-05-30 18:39:37
Message-ID: 12648.1306780777@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 00:21, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 05:39, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>> I wouldn't have a problem with making the Windows port throw an error
>>>> for "local" lines. We'd have to fix initdb to remove that line from the
>>>> sample file (if it doesn't already), but that's surely not hard.

> Here's a patch that I think does what we want. It works fine on
> Windows - I just want to make sure this is what you meant as well?

Looks sane to me.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2011-05-30 18:40:00 Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2011-05-30 18:26:00 Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off