From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hot Standby and prepared transactions |
Date: | 2009-12-16 08:30:44 |
Message-ID: | 1260952244.634.718.camel@ebony |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 09:10 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > Investigating how that could come about, it looks like there is some
> > fairly strange stuff going on here. StandbyRecoverPreparedTransactions()
> > is never called at all.
>
> I told you so:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4B260B5E.3010401@enterprisedb.com
OK, I didn't understand that. Removed.
> > * Skip assert when doing SubTransSetParent in
> > RecoverPreparedTransactions() when in Hot Standby mode because some
> > subxids will have been marked already
>
> Seems reasonable. Let's still Assert that the parent is the same as last
> time.
Fix committed to git.
---
That fixes or explains all known issues, from me. Are there any other
things you know about that I haven't responded to? Do you think we have
addressed every issue, except deferred items?
I will be looking to commit to CVS later today; waiting on any
objections.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hiroyuki Yamada | 2009-12-16 09:08:47 | Re: Hot Standby and prepared transactions |
Previous Message | Gurjeet Singh | 2009-12-16 08:14:41 | Re: Need a mentor, and a project. |