Re: invalidly encoded strings

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: invalidly encoded strings
Date: 2007-09-11 03:00:28
Message-ID: 12574.1189479628@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I'm not sure we are going to be able to catch every path by which
> invalid data can get into the database in one release. I suspect we
> might need two or three goes at this. (I'm just wondering if the
> routines that return cstrings are a possible vector).

We need to have a policy that cstrings are in the database encoding.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-09-11 03:20:02 Re: invalidly encoded strings
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-09-11 02:55:57 Re: invalidly encoded strings

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-09-11 03:20:02 Re: invalidly encoded strings
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-09-11 02:55:57 Re: invalidly encoded strings