From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)Sheeky(dot)Biz>, "Leif B(dot) Kristensen" <leif(at)solumslekt(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Joint user survey with EnterpriseDB? |
Date: | 2009-07-02 07:00:57 |
Message-ID: | 1246518057.27964.402.camel@dn-x300-willij |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 21:27 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 15:37 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > > Just keep re-asking until you hear no objections. That will make it
> > > > fair. Make it seem as if there is the only one person with an objection,
> > > > when others have already agreed.
> > >
> > > Dude, other people objected on specific counts. That is, there were
> > > specific things they objected to, rather than the whole idea. Then,
> > > just like code, we do a "here it is with that specific thing fixed. Is
> > > it OK now?"
> > >
> > > I've got that *you* don't like the whole idea. I don't have that
> > > definitely from *anyone* else (except maybe Gavin, and I'm still not
> > > clear on what his response means), and quite a few people said they
> > > liked the idea -- in fact, the majority who have spoken up on this list.
> >
> > >From your response, I think you'll just keep trying to isolate my
> > opinion until it seems frantic and somehow strange. Calling me dude, or
> > asking me to chill, is a well-known gambit to make my views seem
> > emotional, rather than rational. What's the rush? Why so quick to
> > silence me?
>
> The fact I could have predicted this reaction from Simon says something
> too.
My stance on such marketing issues is well known. Many volunteer/charity
organisations manage to operate without heavy marketing-related branding
and I think it is a shame we cannot have reasonable restrictions on that
also. e.g. Oxfam, Boy Scouts, Churches. These restrictions are normal
and natural in all of the community organisations with which I have been
associated, admittedly all of which are UK based. I see it as a sensible
separation that allows people to work together more easily, not as part
of a moral crusade, which I personally would not claim to lead.
I'm sure many actions and reactions are predictable for both of us. I
don't have a problem with being consistent in my views and values, or
speaking out in favour or defence of them.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-07-02 07:03:32 | Re: Joint user survey with EnterpriseDB? |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2009-07-02 03:54:07 | Re: Joint user survey with EnterpriseDB? |