| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Creager <Robert_Creager(at)LogicalChaos(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 7.4Beta1 "failed to create socket: Address family not |
| Date: | 2003-08-12 13:59:03 |
| Message-ID: | 1220.1060696743@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> The real problem is perhaps that the message gives no hint that it's
>> talking about being unable to establish an IPv6 socket. With that hint,
>> perhaps people would realize that it's not a problem.
> Not sure who took it out, but it gone. The original message was:
> elog(LOG, "IPv6 support disabled --- perhaps the kernel does not support IPv6");
That seems both wordy and not necessarily accurate. What I had in mind
was more like
"could not create IPv6 socket: %m"
But I still wonder whether we shouldn't suppress the message entirely,
at least for EAFNOSUPPORT errors.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vilson farias | 2003-08-12 14:02:22 | Timestamp with zero precision |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-12 13:54:38 | Re: Help! Can't pg_dump anything: handler procedure for procedural language plpgsql not found |