From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [patch] plproxy v2 |
Date: | 2008-07-08 16:11:40 |
Message-ID: | 1215533500.4051.946.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 08:58 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 18:43 +0300, Marko Kreen wrote:
> > On 7/8/08, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > > First let me say that I too enjoy PL/Proxy quite a bit. However, I don't
> > > think it needs to be in core. I wouldn't mind seeing it in contrib (or
> > > better yet modules/ should we ever get around to that).
> >
> > I'm not against contrib/ considering that the docs are now nicely
> > integrated, but then, whats the difference between src/pl/ and contrib/?
> >
>
> I am actually against adding to the grammar
Why?
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2008-07-08 16:13:10 | Re: [patch] plproxy v2 |
Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2008-07-08 16:10:45 | Re: [PATCHES] Extending grant insert on tables to sequences |