Re: Split xlog.c

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Split xlog.c
Date: 2022-02-16 07:53:40
Message-ID: 11e3f99d-2ec9-e9ea-0ac0-31bae1558923@iki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 14/02/2022 11:36, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 27/01/2022 08:34, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 12:12:40PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>> In last round of review, I spotted one bug: I had mixed up the meaning of
>>> EndOfLogTLI. It is the TLI in the *filename* of the WAL segment that we read
>>> the last record from, which can be different from the TLI that the last
>>> record is actually on. All existing tests were passing with that bug, so I
>>> added a test case to cover that case.
>>
>> FYI, this overlaps with a different patch sent recently, as of this
>> thread:
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAJ_b94Vjt5cXGza_1MkjLQWciNdEemsmiWuQj0d=M7JfjAa1g@mail.gmail.com
>
> Thanks, I pushed this new test case now.
>
> With the rest of the patches, I'm seeing a mysterious failure in cirrus
> CI, on macOS on the 027_stream_regress.pl test. It doesn't make much
> sense to me, but I'm investigating that now.

Fixed that, and pushed. Thanks everyone for the reviews!

- Heikki

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2022-02-16 08:43:12 Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum?
Previous Message John Naylor 2022-02-16 07:48:51 Re: some aspects of our qsort might not be ideal