AW: Results of testing WAL

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Mikheev, Vadim'" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: AW: Results of testing WAL
Date: 2000-11-10 08:39:54
Message-ID: 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA687963368105@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> Results: 5000 transactions took ~60 sec in 7.1, ~550 sec in
> 7.0.2 with fsync and ~60 sec without fsync.
>
> So, seems that WAL added not just complexity to system -:)

Wow, this sounds fantastic :-)
I see my concerns where not justified.

Andreas

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Mount 2000-11-10 10:27:32 RE: [INTERFACES] JDBC 'Unterminated quoted string'
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2000-11-10 08:36:55 AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherite d from template1