AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherite d from template1

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Philip Warner'" <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherite d from template1
Date: 2000-11-10 08:36:55
Message-ID: 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA687963368104@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> I have also mentioned this on two occasions now, and each has met with
> total silence. I have come to interpret this to mean either (a) the idea is
> too stupid to rate a comment, or (b) go ahead with the proposal. Since I am
> not really proposing anything, I assume the correct interpretation is (a).

I would interpret (c) it is not really that much of a problem for many,
and what you have done so far was such an improvement that all are happy
for a while.

Andreas

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2000-11-10 08:39:54 AW: Results of testing WAL
Previous Message Christof Petig 2000-11-10 07:05:38 Re: Query caching