| From: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Philip Warner'" <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | AW: AW: Backup, restore & pg_dump |
| Date: | 2000-10-17 08:47:59 |
| Message-ID: | 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA6879633680AE@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> >So, pg_dump should be preserved asis.
> >
>
> Just to clarify; I have no intention of doing anything nasty to pg_dump.
> All I plan to do is rename the pg_restore to one of
> pg_load/pg_import/pg_undump/pmud_gp, to make way for a WAL based restore
> utility, although as Bruce suggests, this may be premature.
It is not premature. We will need a WAL based restore for 7.1
or we imho don't need to enable WAL for 7.1 at all.
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mikheev, Vadim | 2000-10-17 09:36:14 | Re: AW: Backup, restore & pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB | 2000-10-17 08:29:37 | AW: Re: New relkind for views |