| From: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Mark Hollomon'" <mhh(at)mindspring(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | AW: Re: New relkind for views |
| Date: | 2000-10-17 08:29:37 |
| Message-ID: | 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA6879633680AD@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > > > Currently a view may be dropped with either 'DROP VIEW'
> > > > or 'DROP TABLE'. Should this be changed?
> > >
> > > I say let them drop it with either one.
> >
> > I kinda like the 'drop index with drop index', 'drop table with drop
> > table' and 'drop view with drop view' groupings ... at least you are
> > pretty sure you haven't 'oopsed' in the process :)
> >
>
> So the vote is now tied. Any other opinions
Same here: allow "drop view" only
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB | 2000-10-17 08:47:59 | AW: AW: Backup, restore & pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-10-17 08:08:37 | Re: =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCflYlaSVKJWQbKEI=?=: [HACKERS] Otvet: WAL and indexes (Re: [HACKERS] WAL status & todo) |