From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: system views for walsender activity |
Date: | 2010-06-18 14:21:52 |
Message-ID: | 11965.1276870912@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Let's discuss what the best possible user interface for the information
> would be first, and then decide if we need/want to force an initdb for
> that. We have pg_upgrade now, that makes initdb less painful, and if
> it's just a new view it might be possible to just add a note in the
> release notes that you'll have to run the CREATE VIEW manually if upgrading.
The view would presumably depend on a C-language SRF, which isn't there
either.
I'm of the opinion that this is a 9.1 problem. It needs more thought
than we can put into it now --- one obvious question is what about
monitoring on the slave side? Another is who should be able to see the
data?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | depstein | 2010-06-18 14:26:05 | pg_upgrade issues |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-06-18 13:59:57 | Re: Debug message in RemoveOldXlogFiles |