| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Debug message in RemoveOldXlogFiles |
| Date: | 2010-06-18 13:59:57 |
| Message-ID: | 11541.1276869597@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I think it would be more helpful if it showed a filename. Shall we
> change that?
The point of the committed change was to make that message look like
every other one in xlog.c that shows a log/seg pair.
If we were going to start redesigning the printout format, I'd
personally vote for something that makes it easier to compare LSN
printouts and log/seg printouts, like maybe printing log/seg as the
file's starting LSN. But the main point is that considering any one of
these messages in isolation is the wrong approach. In any case it's a
bit late to be bikeshedding this for 9.0.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-06-18 14:21:52 | Re: system views for walsender activity |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-06-18 12:50:59 | Re: system views for walsender activity |