Re: Last infomask bit

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Last infomask bit
Date: 2007-01-09 22:29:28
Message-ID: 11834.1168381768@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Patch applied. Thanks.
> I added a comment about the unused bits in the header file.

Has anyone bothered to measure the overhead added by having to mask to
fetch or store the natts value? This is not a zero-cost improvement.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-09 22:29:34 Re: [HACKERS] Patch to log usage of temporary files
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-01-09 22:24:38 Re: [HACKERS] Patch to log usage of temporary files

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-09 22:29:34 Re: [HACKERS] Patch to log usage of temporary files
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-01-09 22:24:38 Re: [HACKERS] Patch to log usage of temporary files