| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Sergey Koposov <koposov(at)ast(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: slow dropping of tables, DropRelFileNodeBuffers, tas |
| Date: | 2012-06-07 19:22:10 |
| Message-ID: | 11750.1339096930@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 7 June 2012 17:34, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Oh, I must be confused about which patch we are talking about --- I
>> thought this was in reference to some of the WIP ideas that were being
>> thrown about with respect to using lock-free access primitives. Which
>> patch are you proposing for commit now, exactly?
> Both of these, as attached up thread.
> Simon's patch - dropallforks.v1.patch
> Jeff's patch - DropRelFileNodeBuffers_unlock_v1.patch
> (needs a little tidyup)
OK, will take a look.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-06-07 19:40:45 | Re: pg_basebackup blocking all queries with horrible performance |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-06-07 19:08:12 | Re: XLog changes for 9.3 |