From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: XLog changes for 9.3 |
Date: | 2012-06-07 19:08:12 |
Message-ID: | 11524.1339096092@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 7 June 2012 19:52, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> This seems like nonsense to me. How many external scripts are likely to
>> know that we skip the FF page? There might be some, but not many.
> If that is the only change in filenames, then all is forgiven.
Oh, now I see what you're on about. Yes, I agree that we should
maintain the same formatting of WAL segment file names, even though
it will be rather artificial in the 64-bit-arithmetic world. The
only externally visible change should be the creation of FF-numbered
files where formerly those were skipped.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-06-07 19:22:10 | Re: slow dropping of tables, DropRelFileNodeBuffers, tas |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-06-07 18:57:07 | Re: XLog changes for 9.3 |