From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Jim Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] wal_checksum = on (default) | off |
Date: | 2007-01-11 23:10:38 |
Message-ID: | 1168557038.3990.45.camel@silverbirch.site |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 17:06 +0000, Gregory Stark wrote:
> Having a CRC in WAL but not in the heap seems kind of pointless.
Yes...
> If your
> hardware is unreliable the corruption could anywhere.
Agreed.
Other DBMS have one setting for the whole server; I've never seen
separate settings for WAL and data.
> Depending on it to solve
> multiple problems means we can't offer the option to disable it
> because it
> would affect other things as well.
>
> What I would like to see is a CRC option that would put CRC checks in
> every
> disk page whether heap, index, WAL, control file, etc. I think we
> would
> default that to off to match our current setup most closely.
>
> Separately we would have a feature in WAL to detect torn pages so that
> we can
> reliably detect the end of valid WAL. That would have to always be on.
> But
> having it as a separate feature means the CRC could be optional.
Your thoughts seem logical to me.
It does seem a bigger project than I'd envisaged, but doable, one day.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-01-11 23:12:07 | Re: [HACKERS] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-11 23:10:20 | Re: [HACKERS] unusual performance for vac following 8.2 upgrade |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2007-01-12 02:04:12 | NaN behavior |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-01-11 22:49:11 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Patch to log usage of temporary files |