From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org> |
Cc: | usleepless(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0 |
Date: | 2006-11-10 22:39:59 |
Message-ID: | 1163198399.6530.31.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
> Now the question is, do you guys really want to put in that much effort?
> I am all for making as much things as easy as sensible. But imho
> PostgreSQL is best served if you guys focus on what has distingished it
> from MySQL. And that is providing a platform with superior SQL standards
> completeness and compliance. And extensible framework that promotes user
> choice over one size fits all defaults.
>
I am still wondering why the PostgreSQL *community* is trying to compete
with the MySQL *Corporation*.
Joshua D. Drake
> regards,
> Lukas
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Leif B. Kristensen | 2006-11-10 23:58:16 | Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0 |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2006-11-10 21:33:11 | Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0 |