From: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | New variable server_version_num |
Date: | 2006-07-30 01:14:16 |
Message-ID: | 1154222056.5336.62.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Today on IRC David Fetter and some others were discussing version
numbers and we realized that although libpq now provides the version of
Postgres as a number, this is still a wheel that is being reinvented by
apps many times over, as it is not available any other way. Hence, a
small patch to provide a new variable "server_version_num", which is
almost the same as "server_version" but uses the handy PG_VERSION_NUM
which allows apps to do things like if ($version >= 80200) without
having to parse apart the value of server_version themselves.
--
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200607292113
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
server_version_num.patch | text/x-patch | 3.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-30 01:44:10 | Re: New variable server_version_num |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-29 23:45:08 | Re: Performance of the listen command |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2006-07-30 01:24:54 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-29 23:30:42 | Re: Do we need multiple forms of the SQL2003 statistics |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2006-07-30 01:24:54 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-29 23:05:13 | Re: [HACKERS] putting CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in |